Channel Islands continue to lead the way for VAT certainty

comment - 09 March 2016

Channel Islands continue to lead the way for VAT certainty

The ECJ’s ruling in the case of Fiscale Eenheid X is the latest step in its drive to establish a uniform application of the VAT Directive and its exemptions, but it could have a significant impact on the future of cross-border fund structuring in the EU.

On 9 December 2015 the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") issued its decision in the case of Fiscale Eenheid X. The ECJ was asked to consider whether a non-UCITS fund vehicle investing solely in real estate assets would qualify as a "special investment fund" for the purposes of the fund management exemption under the VAT Directive. The ECJ ruled that such a fund could qualify as a "special investment fund" if (among other things, but, perhaps, most significantly) it is subject to "specific state supervision" at national level. Consequently the ECJ held that fund management services provided to the fund in question should be treated as a VAT exempt supply.

The "specific state supervision" concept is a new development and one which, unless further defined or refined by the ECJ or individual Member States, could well bring all funds regulated under the AIFMD within the scope of the "special investment fund" definition. Whilst there is some uncertainty among industry observers as to whether, for instance, EuVECA and sub-threshold AIFs would also be deemed to be subject to "specific state supervision", the consensus seems to be that, despite the light-touch nature of these regimes, they would. Queries have also been raised as to whether funds which are subject to stock exchange supervision would also qualify.

Although the answers to these questions remain unclear, the Eenheid ruling may have paved the way for the majority of Member States to adopt a far broader interpretation of the fund management exemption than before, aligning the pan-European position with that already established in Luxembourg. If adopted, the implications for fund managers from a VAT perspective are potentially significant.

Prior to the Eenheid ruling, well-advised fund managers looking to establish on-shore fund structures could capitalise on Member States’ differing interpretations of the VAT Directive and its exemptions. For instance, a UK based advisor could provide fund management services to a Luxembourg based fund and recover against the supply in the UK (where the management exemption has been narrowly construed historically, with the supply being standard rated), but treat the supply as exempt in Luxembourg. The net result of such structures has been (generally) that no VAT is incurred at fund level.

Harmonising the application of the fund management exemption across the EU in accordance with the Eenheid ruling (and the Lux position) should ensure VAT neutrality for EU fund vehicles (which, as a general rule, make VAT exempt supplies). However, fund managers are likely to find it increasingly difficult to recover input VAT, which could lead to VAT leakage (particularly in connection with set up and abort costs). As a result, the VAT efficiency of traditional cross-border, on-shore fund structures may require re-appraisal and/or fund service costs may increase to reflect the loss of input VAT recoverability.

Although the full implications of the Eenheid ruling remain to be clarified, the Channel Islands (falling outside the scope of VAT and offering a range of flexible structuring options) continue to provide fund managers with the most VAT efficient structuring solutions. Recent developments in hybrid fund structuring should also make it possible for managers to establish passportable, AIFMD-compliant structures which retain the VAT efficiency and day-to-day ease of use associated with doing business in the Channel Islands (for more information, please follow this link).


previous comment / James McCarthy

Brexit: what next for alternative investment funds industry?

After a period of market and political turbulence, the dust has (for now at least) started to settle. Yet despite share prices rebounding and Sterling stabilising, the long-term ra... Read More

Loading image Loading...

If you would like to discuss outsourcing to the Aztec Group or are considering migrating a fund or SPV, please call James Duffield, Head of Business Development, on +44 20 3818 0250.

Aztec Group Guernsey

Aztec Financial Services (Guernsey) Limited
PO Box 656, East Wing, Trafalgar Court
Les Banques, St Peter Port, Guernsey, GY1 3PP

Telephone: +44 1481 749700
Facsimile: +44 1481 749749

LocationDownload PDF Details

Aztec Group Jersey

Aztec Financial Services (Jersey) Limited
Aztec Group House, PO Box 730
11-15 Seaton Place, St Helier, Jersey, JE4 0QH

Telephone: +44 1534 833000
Facsimile: +44 1534 833033

LocationDownload PDF Details

Aztec Group UK - London

Aztec Financial Services (UK) Limited
2 Throgmorton Avenue

Telephone: +44 20 3818 0250

LocationDownload PDF Details

Aztec Group Luxembourg

Aztec Financial Services (Luxembourg) S.A.
8, rue Lou Hemmer, L-1748, Luxembourg – Findel
Grand-Duché de Luxembourg

Telephone:+352 246 160 6000
Facsimile: +352 246 160 6016

LocationDownload PDF Details

Aztec Group The Netherlands

Aztec Financial Services (Netherlands) BV
Spaces Zuidas, Barbara Strozzilaan 201
1083 HN Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Telephone: +31 20 794 4820
Facsimile: +31 20 794 4821

LocationDownload PDF Details

Aztec Group UK - Southampton

Aztec Financial Services (UK) Limited
Forum 3, Solent Business Park
Parkway South, Whiteley, Fareham, PO15 7FH

Telephone: +44 238 202 2300
Facsimile: +44 238 202 2309

LocationDownload PDF Details

Aztec Group Sweden

Cetza Financial Services (Sweden) AB
Strandvägen 7a, 114 56, Stockholm, Sweden

Telephone: +46 8 124 488 88
Facsimile: +46 8 124 488 99

LocationDownload PDF Details